Dispatches From The Defendant's Side Of The Criminal Law: Judge Steven Crocker Is No Rubber Stamp

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Judge Steven Crocker Is No Rubber Stamp

Federal prosecutors in Madison, Wisconsin recently withdrew a subpoena seeking the identities of thousands of people who bought used books through online retailer Amazon.com Inc. The withdrawal came after United Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker ruled the customers have a right to keep their reading habits from the government.

In ruling against the government Judge Crocker wrote, "The (subpoena's) chilling effect on expressive e-commerce would frost keyboards across America." Judge Crocker went on to say, "Well-founded or not, rumors of an Orwellian federal criminal investigation into the reading habits of Amazon's customers could frighten countless potential customers into canceling planned online book purchases." In quashing the subpoena Judge Crocker held that First Amendment concerns outweighed the subpoena's law enforcement purpose.

Judge Crocker not only refused the government's request to enforce the subpoena but also disclosed the subpoena's existence over the government efforts to keep the entire matter secret. Amazon's attorneys praised the ruling and said they hope Judge Crocker's decision will make it more difficult for prosecutors to obtain records involving book purchases.

Kudos to a judicial officer who stood up for the American people and the Constitution.

1 comment:

ladybroadoak said...: This is now crossposted to my blog as I am garnering up items related to impeachable offenses on the part of the Bushistas and someone "tipped me off" to this post.

Thank God for Steven Crocker acting so quickly to the good, as IF someone had ruled that the First Amendment wasn't violated there may have been HELL TO PAY.

The so-called Thought Crimes bill has passed CONgress. SIGH. Interesting how certain people who are afraid of being charged with WAR CRIMES abstained from the voting.

I was watched the CSPAN coverage of the Congressional hearings on HR 1955. It seemed to me appalling to see so many Isreali's testify to its efficacy, actually - those who represent Israeli security firms who will get the contracts to keep tabs on everyone. The Isreali government are negotiating to run them up here in Canada, too (and we think they are already signed, actually, and that our Minister of Public Safey is lieing about that.)

I call all this the "militarization of policing myself, whereby whoever is making the judgment call is judge, jury and execution when they find out about someone that has been "snitched" on

.. and also that something is amist when an entity not even domestically accountable is running the security computers.

The implication of this bill and of Sensenbrenner's HR 1528 can be used as a pretty good summary of the "what ifs" to follow if good judges are not found. Unfortunately these cases should not be resolved in courts as the Constitution DOES apply, whatever bills CONgress passes if any rule of law is left.

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2005/05/16/062/97281; December 1, 2007 at 10:49 PM

Post a Comment

Outline Of A Federal Case

The following is a very broad overview of the stages of a typical federal criminal case.

Defendants are usually brought to federal court in the custody of federal agents. Unless the Grand Jury has already charged the defendant by indictment, the charges against the defendant are set forth in a criminal complaint. The criminal complaint is accompanied by an affidavit that summarizes the evidence against the defendant.

At the defendant's first appearance the defendant will appear before a federal magistrate judge. This magistrate will preside over the first two or three appearances, but the case will ultimately be referred to a federal district court judge.

The prosecutor appearing for the government is called an "Assistant United States Attorney," or "AUSA." There are no District Attorney's or "DAs" in federal court. "

When a defendant first appears before a magistrate, he or she is informed of certain constitutional rights, such as the right to remain silent. The magistrate judge informs the defendant of the charges and the statutory maximum sentence that accompanies each charge. The "statutory maximum" is the most jail time that a defendant can receive -- it is rarely the actual sentence that is given. The magistrate judge then turns to the issue of release, or bail.

If the government wants the defendant detained, the prosecutor will move for detention at the initial appearance. Bail in federal court is controlled by the Bail Reform Act (18 USC § 3141 et seq.). There are some types of criminal charges where the government gets an automatic three days to prepare for a bail hearing. These are called presumption cases and include offenses such as drug dealing, child sex and child porn offenses and crimes of violence, like bank robbery. The government may also try to detain by proving that the defendant is a flight risk, or a danger to the community. In those instances the government also gets three days to prepare for the bail hearing. The defense can ask for up to five days to prepare for the bail hearing.

Pretrial Services is a neutral court agency that interviews the defendant, prepares a short life background and criminal history for the court and makes a bail recommendation. The defendant’s attorney should accompany the defendant to the pretrial services interview.

Before the bail hearing, the attorney works with the defendant to identify resources to post for bail. Bail bondsmen are usually not involved in federal court. If the defendant is released at the bail hearing, it is often with conditions. Typical conditions include reporting to Pretrial Services and drug testing. More restrictive conditions can include electronic home monitoring or release to a halfway house facility.

Within 10 days of the initial appearance for in-custody defendants, and within 20 days of initial appearance for out-of-custody defendants, a defendant is entitled to a preliminary hearing or, if indicted, arraignment.

There are always federal grand juries sitting in the Western District of Washington. A defendant will usually be arraigned on an indictment instead of having a preliminary hearing. This is because the government usually elects to indict rather than give the defendant a preliminary hearing and a Grand Jury indictment eliminates the need for a preliminary hearing.

An indictment is a formal charging document that contains the federal charges faced by the defendant. The goverment presents evidence to the grand jury, and if there is sufficient evidence to to establish probable cause, the grand jury returns an indictment, which is also called a true bill. There can be many indictments brought in one case – later indictments are called "superceding indictments."

At arraignment the defendant enters a not guilty plea. The clerk will announce a trial date and a date that pretrial motions must be filed. The defense attorney will also ask for discovery. Once there is an indictment the case gets a new case number. The initials on the end of the number are those of the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.

A district court judge, or "Article III" judge, is appointed by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and serves for life. The district court judge will preside over the rest of the case, for all hearings, the trial, and sentencing.

There are an enormous variety of pretrial motions that can be filed in a criminal case. These can include constitutional challenges, motions for a bill of particulars, motions to strike surplusage, and severance motions. The most typical pretrial motions are suppression motions where the defense moves to suppress evidence, or to prevent the government from using certain evidence at trial. Suppression motions can include suppression of evidence, like a gun or drugs seized in a search, or statements, like a defendant’s confession.

In the vast majority of federal cases, the defendant pleads guilty and does not go to trial. A defendant can plead guilty as charged or or can strike a deal with the prosecutor and enter what is called a plea agreement. Often the defense attorney and government attorney will spend considerable time negotiating the terms of a plea agreement.

In considering whether to accept a plea agreement the defense attorney will discuss with the defendant the benefits of pleading guilty versus the sentencing consequences if the defendant is convicted after trial. The greater the benefit under the plea agreement the more likely the attorney will recommend that the defendant accept the plea agreement. However, the attorney can only give advice; it is the defendant’s decision alone on whether or not to accept a plea offer or to go to trial.

A small proportion of federal cases go to trial. The typical federal trial lasts three days to a week but some trials, usually multiple defendant "white collar" crimes and complex drug conspiracies, can takes several weeks to try.

At trial, the defendant has a right have the case decided by a jury of 12 citizens. The defense can preemptory excuse jurors whom it feels will not be favorable to the defense case and excuse for cause jurors who are biased or indicate that they cannot be fair and impartial.

At trial the defendant has many right including the right to testify – or to not testify, and if he or she does not testify, that cannot be held against the defendant by the jury. The defendant also has the right to "confront" and cross-examine government witnesses and government evidence, and can use the subpoena power of the court to secure evidence or witnesses on his or her behalf for trial. The defendant is not required to prove him or herself innocent; the government bears the burden of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt as to every element of a charge. Only if all 12 unanimously agree that the government has proved every element of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt can the jury return a verdict convicting the defendant of some or all of the charged crimes.

A defendant can be convicted of an offense by either pleading guilty or by being found guilty after a trial. If a defendant is convicted, sentencing will take place approximately seventy-five days later if the defendant is in custody, or ninety days later if the defendant is out of custody. If out on pretrial release a defendant convicted of a crime will often be remanded into custody after trial.

Probation, like Pretrial Services, are officers of the court and are neutral – they don’t answer to either the defense or the prosecution. Several weeks after the conviction, the defendant will be interviewed by a Probation Officer, with defense counsel present. The Probation Officer will then take information from that interview and along with material provided by the government, and will prepare a draft presentence report (or PSR). The draft presentence report is provided to defense counsel and the government thirty-five days before sentencing. The parties must make factual or legal objections to the report within ten days of receipt. The court does not receive a copy of this draft report – the goal is to resolve as many factual or legal errors as possible before a PSR is provided to the judge.

Fourteen days before sentencing, the final PSR is provided to the judge. This final PSR describes the defendant’s background, describes the offense, and calculates the federal sentencing guidelines. It also includes a recommended sentence, and lists any unresolved objections. Seven days before sentencing, the parties submit sentencing memoranda to the court, arguing for their proposed sentences. Three days later, the parties may submit replies to the sentencing memos. At the sentencing hearing, the district court judge will resolve any remaining objections to the PSR, make factual findings, and will consider the factors of the key sentencing statute - 18 USC § 3553(a) in deciding upon a sentence.

In addition to a custodial sentence, the court will also decide how much restitution is owed, and whether a criminal fine is appropriate. Before imposing the sentence, the court must permit the defendant to speak (or "allocute.")

After conviction the defendant has 10 days to file a notice of appeal or the right of appeal is lost.

Dispatches From The Defendant's Side Of The Criminal Law

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Judge Steven Crocker Is No Rubber Stamp

1 comment:

Profile

Outline Of A Federal Case

Useful Criminal Links

Blog Archive

Blog Hit Counter