Sunday, December 30, 2007

C'mon Judge Mosman, This Is A State Issue And Not A Federal Case

United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman (D. OR) has issued an order placing on hold an Oregon domestic partnership law set to take effect Jan. 1, 2008. Although the law would not allow same sex marriages, the Oregon law would give important spousal rights to same-sex couples such as inheritance rights, child-rearing and custody rights, the right to joint state tax filings, joint health, auto and homeowners insurance policy rightss, and visitation rights at hospitals, among others.

The law does not purport or attempt to affect any federal benefits for married couples, like Social Security and joint filing of federal tax returns. The Oregon Domestic Partnership law solely affects state rights.

After the Oregon Legislature approved the domestic partnership law, gay rights opponents launched an effort to collect enough signatures to suspend the law and place it on the ballot for a statewide vote. Opponents of the law asked the federal courts to intercede after the Oregon secretary of state's office ruled that the effort to block the law via referendum had failed to collect enough valid signatures to be placed on the statewide ballot.

The state's largest gay rights group, Basic Rights Oregon, criticized the judge's decision. Both morally and legally they have a valid point. The domestic partnership law does not discriminate; it does not deprive any citizen of the equal protection of the law; and whether a state law was validly enacted or not is a state’s right issue.

No comments: