Sunday, October 28, 2007

Innocent!

In 1970 Congress enacted the first federal criminal forfeiture law in the form of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The purported justification for criminal forfeiture was that it was a criminal punishment for the guilty; a punishment imposed through a criminal proceeding directed against an individual for his criminal acts. Since 1970 Congress has steadily increased the types of criminal offenses for which criminal forfeiture is a sanction.

Forfeiture laws, both criminal and civil, have become increasingly popular with state and federal law enforcement officials. A subject that was once relegated to obscure passages in the musty recesses of law books, and rarely invoked in practice, has become the darling of law enforcement. Over the past 20 years, criminal and civil forfeiture have become a major weapon in both the states’ and the federal government's "war on drugs." In many jurisdictions local police rely on seized and forfeited property to significantly finance their operational budgets. Forfeitures have truly become a monetary tail wagging the law enforcement dog.

I just finished reading a book by Sam Harris entitled The End of Faith. Mr. Harris makes many intelligent and well reasoned arguments pointing out the dangers and absurdities of organized religion. But when Mr. Harris recounts for his readers the horrors of the 12th and 13th century Holy Inquisition, it occured to me that it is from this dark period in human history from whence our modern day forfeiture laws have sprung. According to Mr. Harris, although The Holy Inquisition formally began under Pope Lucius III in 1184, it really hit its stride in 1199, when Pope Innocent III decreed that all property belonging to a convicted heretic would be forfeited to the Church and shared with local officials as a reward for their candor in exposing a heretic.

Drug dealer? Heretic? Both alleged miscreants engaged in victimless crimes with local officials only too happy to share in the plunder of their worldly goods. How ironic. The man to whom we can trace our morally bankrupt practice of criminal forfeiture was a religious man named Innocent!

No comments: